Journal of Military History
Article Abstracts
Vol. 70, No. 1
January 2006
Articles:
Andrea Brady, "Dying with Honour: Literary Propaganda
and the Second English Civil War," The Journal of Military
History 70 (January 2006): 9-30.
- This article discusses contemporary responses to the executions
under martial law of Sir Charles Lucas and Sir George Lisle in
1648, following General Thomas Fairfax's siege of Colchester.
It compares the royalist propaganda, which established these
two royalist partisans as martyred heroes, to the Parliamentary
and Army propaganda, which lamented the assassination of the
well-known New Model Army colonel Thomas Rainsborough two months
later. Analysing newsbooks, accounts by participants and observers,
and literary responses (especially the elegy), it finds that
popular writers used these deaths to impugn the honour of their
opponents, and consequently to argue against reconciliation or
compromise.
-
Kerry E. Irish, "Apt Pupil: Dwight Eisenhower and the
1930 Industrial Mobilization Plan," The Journal of Military
History 70 (January 2006): 31-61.
- This article takes the view that Dwight D. Eisenhower's work
as a staff officer in the War Department in the early 1930s was
significant not only for his own career, but also for the United
States. In these years, Eisenhower wrote the first detailed industrial
mobilization plan, the blueprint the nation would follow if it
entered a major war. Though not formally implemented in 1941,
much of Eisenhower's plan provided the basis for a more efficient
transition to war production than had occurred during World War
I. Moreover, his work enhanced his reputation in the Army.
-
Bob Moore, "Unwanted Guests in Troubled Times: German
Prisoners of War in the Union of South Africa, 1942-1943,"
The Journal of Military History 70 (January 2006): 63-89.
- This study examines the role of the Union of South Africa
in acting as a detaining power for German prisoners of war taken
during the North African campaigns of 1942-43. It highlights
the specific problems caused by the sixty-eight hundred German
prisoners as potential threats to domestic security in South
Africa at a time of internal dissension, contrasting these with
the relatively straightforward absorption of one hundred thousand
Italian prisoners in the same period. It also looks at the more
general problems faced by the British imperial authorities in
dealing with German prisoners in this critical period of the
war.
-
John M. Hawkins, "The Costs of Artillery: Eliminating
Harassment and Interdiction Fire During the Vietnam War,"
The Journal of Military History 70 (January 2006): 91-122.
- In Vietnam during 1966 and 1967, the United States Army expended
nearly half of its artillery ammunition in unobserved Harassment
and Interdiction (H&I) strikes. By June 1970, the army had
nearly eliminated H&I. The reasons for this shift inform
the ongoing debate over American strategy during the Vietnam
War. Although both General William C. Westmoreland and his successor,
General Creighton W. Abrams, emphasized that poorly applied firepower
could cause collateral damage, neither leader viewed H&I
as inherently counterproductive. Indeed, both leaders responded
to budgetary pressures, rather than concern over civilian casualties,
when reducing H&I. Neither reduced H&I fire as part of
a radical shift in strategy.
Return
to Back Issues Page